movieboxappsxyz

★ 3.420211h 43m

Lone Wolf

دراماخيال علميإثارة

In the near-future, where constant surveillance is the norm, a group of activists plan an act of urban terrorism, unaware that they may be lured into a trap.

Title overview

Core release details, quality markers, and stream status stay together here instead of floating below the fold.

دراماخيال علميإثارة

السنة

2021

المدة

1h 43m

IMDb

3.4

Playback

Start watching now

Release2021

Runtime1h 43m

IMDb★ 3.4

شاهد الآن

طاقم العمل

Jonathan Ogilvie

Director

Hugo Weaving

Minister

Diana Glenn

Kylie

Tilda Cobham-Hervey

Winnie

Josh McConville

Conrad

Stephen Curry

Assistant Commissioner

Marlon Williams

Alex Ossipon

Chris Bunton

Stevie

LM

Lawrence Mooney

Father Michaelis

Tyler Coppin

Hippy Karl

JC

Jim Coulson

Toodles

Karlis Zaid

Vladimir

AG

Alexander Gavioli

Young Customer

Roy Barker

Mortician

Steven Kwon

Groom

BZ

Betsie Zhang

Bride

AW

Adam White

Bridal Video Operator

Eddie Baroo

Rolli from Magic Carpets

HO

Hamish Ogilvie

Gene from Magic Carpets

Jonathan Ogilvie

Writer

Joseph Conrad

Writer

الإعلان الترويجي

اختيارات مميزة

هل تريد المزيد من الترفيه؟ استكشف منصة الألعاب المقترحة ووجهة الدراما القصيرة التي نوصي بها.

ألعاب فورية

Gamixo

العب ألعاب المتصفح الخفيفة مثل الألغاز والورق والرياضة والتحديات السريعة خلال ثوانٍ.

دراما قصيرة

VSKIT Drama

شاهد المسلسلات القصيرة الرائجة وقصص الرومانسية والدراما الجديدة مع تحديثات يومية سريعة.

التعليقات

3 تعليق

user4121114070630May 29, 2023

DnQ_💙Feb 15, 2023

This movie is trash. The writing's bad, the concept isn't, at all, interesting, and it seems to pose as a sci-fi movie -- which, it isn't. This is my assessment, after making it through twenty-nine minutes of this film. To be fair, it is possible that there's some sci-fi element to this movie, and I just didn't bother to stick around long enough to find out what it is. Like I've said, I only lasted twenty-nine minutes. As far as I can tell, the only thing that may be considered sci-fi, is the notion of automated surveillance. If that's the sci-fi concept, then it's pretty thin. I stopped watching this movie because it's painfully boring, and doesn't seem to have much of a direction. After a while, I found myself wondering, "What, exactly, am I looking at?" After turning it off, I read the synopsis, and concluded that the synopsis does a better job explaining the movie, than me actually watching the movie. This is a clear sign of terrible writing. If your audience watches twenty-nine minutes of your film, and is confused about what they're watching, your writing isn't clever, or innovative, it's just bad. After reading the synopsis, I came to realize that I hadn't missed anything. My confusion wasn't due to me not paying attention. After all, the synopsis seems to fill in the gaps and explain what I was watching. However, if I have to read the synopsis, in order to make the movie more coherent, then the writer has clearly dropped the ball. I don't recommend this movie to anyone. Unless you're the writer, or unless you helped create this movie, in some way, or are a friend of someone in either of these capacities, then you're not likely to find any value in this film. I give this movie two stars because, although the writing and execution are terrible, the filmmaker does have competent technical skills. The camera isn't shaky, the audio is fine, the acting is adequate -- things like that. However, that's a low bar, when we're talking about the quality of a movie.

Paulette Butterfy🦋Feb 15, 2023

Matrix 4 was a flop, needless to say--pc reboots typically are; Hugo Weaving gave an awesome performance in this peace and if he turned down M4 to do this I commend him for being so discerning. This film is 1000x better than m4.